DRESSED TO KILL by Brian De Palma and Campbell Black, book vs. film

PUBLISHER: Bantam, 1/1980
MY RATING: 4 stars

SYNOPSIS: A psychiatrist's patient is brutally murdered by a mysterious blonde woman with an obviously troubled sexual history. A call girl witnesses it and is now on the murderer's list to kill.

MY THOUGHTS/SPOILERS: Campbell Black wrote the novel that's based on Brian De Palma's screenplay. I like the novel better than the film. The novel gives us more background on Bobbi, one of Dr. Robert Elliott's transgendered patients. We get a few flashback scenes of her childhood that aren't in the film. Also not in the film are two scenes of her chatting with men in bars.

I don't like Bobbi's reason for killing. I think the reason's really stupid. I also think Nancy Allen's acting was terrible. I thought the scene where Kate meets the man at the museum lasted far too long and that the scene in the taxi with him on the way from the museum was ridiculous and unnecessary. Her finding out the man had STD's was completely pointless considering she got murdered immediately afterward.

Some differences between novel and film are:

-Kate Myers' (Angie Dickenson) last name was changed to Miller in the film. 

-Near the beginning of the novel, Bobbi leaves a message on Dr. Elliott's answering machine telling him she's stolen something but doesn't say what it is, leaving him to figure out what it is. In the film she says she stole his straight razor.

-The man Kate meets and goes home with was given one more STD in the film than in the novel. In the novel he only has gonorrhea but was given syphilis too in the film.

-The character Norma, Liz's friend, was in the novel visiting Liz and she thought she'd seen the killer in the elevator of Liz's building. That's not in the film at all.

-Dr. Elliott speaks to his wife Anne several times on the phone in the novel but she's only mentioned once in the film and he never speaks to her on the phone.

-The scene in the film where Peter, Liz's fifteen-year-old son, played by Keith Gordon, is in the police station eavesdropping on a conversation, in the novel he's doing it by putting a dirty drinking glass to the wall then putting his ear to it. In the film he's got a listening device attatched to the wall and his ear.

-It's stated in the novel that Liz is twenty-one but ages aren't mentioned for her or Peter in the film.

-Liz's character is softened up a bit in the film. In the novel she's far more foul-mouthed.

-In the film, after the killer is identified, Liz spends time at Peter's house while his stepfather's away, then she has a terrible nightmare. In the novel she only makes plans to have lunch one day with Peter and doesn't go to this house. 

-Major spoiler for the ending of novel- I don't think the ending was a dream Liz was having but I'm not quite sure. She's attacked by Bobbi and, "A dream, Liz thought. A bad dream. In a moment she would wake. Any moment now, she would open her eyes and the dream would be over. But it hadn't yet begun." Her bad dream in the film was clearly a dream. When Bobbi visits her at the end of the novel, that sequence was different than in the film and I don't see it was being an actual dream. So the film had a happy ending and the novel, as far as I'm concerned, didn't, which I like.

I learned that this was similar to the Italian film The Bird With the Crystal Plumage. I watched it and it is indeed similar. That one was likely inspired by the novel/film Screaming Mimi. In the DVD extras on my edition, no one interviewed mentioned this film being inspired by another one.